TLDR
Restricted fund accounting is the practice of maintaining separate accounting records for contributions that donors or grantors have restricted to a specific purpose or time period. Since ASU 2016-14 (effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017), nonprofits present two net asset classes: with-donor-restrictions and without-donor-restrictions. Recording, tracking, and releasing restrictions correctly is fundamental to accurate nonprofit financial reporting — and to avoiding the compliance findings that arise when restricted funds are spent on the wrong things.
Understanding how restricted funds work in nonprofit accounting is not optional for organizations that receive grants. It is the accounting foundation on which compliance reporting, audit defense, and funder relationships rest. Get it wrong, and the financial statements misrepresent the organization’s position; get it right, and the same financial statements become a management tool for understanding what resources are available and where they are committed.
The Net Asset Framework Under ASU 2016-14
The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s ASU 2016-14, effective for most nonprofits in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, restructured how nonprofits classify net assets. The previous three-class system (unrestricted, temporarily restricted, permanently restricted) was simplified to two classes:
With-donor-restrictions: Resources subject to donor-imposed conditions that have not yet been met. This includes:
- Purpose restrictions (funds restricted to a specific program or activity)
- Time restrictions (funds that cannot be spent until a future date)
- Endowment funds where the principal is permanently restricted
Without-donor-restrictions: Resources the governing board can direct to any organizational purpose. This includes:
- General operating funds
- Funds the board has internally designated for specific purposes (board designations are internal actions, not donor restrictions)
- Net assets released from donor restriction after conditions are met
The change from three to two classes was meant to simplify reporting while retaining the essential distinction between funds the organization controls freely and funds subject to external conditions.
Recording a Restricted Contribution
When a grant award letter is received or a restricted donation is collected, the accounting entry is:
Debit: Cash (or Pledge Receivable) $X
Credit: Contribution Revenue — With Restrictions $X
This entry increases the with-donor-restrictions net asset class. The contribution appears as revenue in the with-donor-restrictions column of the Statement of Activities.
For multi-year grants, record revenue only when a contribution is unconditional. If a grant is awarded as a two-year commitment with the second year contingent on the first year’s performance, the second year payment is conditional and should not be recorded as revenue until the condition is met (or unless the conditions are so unlikely to fail that they are treated as administrative formalities under ASC 958 guidance).
The Journal Entry to Release a Restriction
When restricted funds are spent on the specified purpose (or when a time restriction expires), the restriction is released. The entry:
Debit: Net Assets Released — With Restrictions $X
Credit: Net Assets Released — Without Restrictions $X
Simultaneously, record the actual program expense in the without-donor-restrictions class:
Debit: Program Expense $X
Credit: Cash (or Accounts Payable) $X
In practice, many accounting systems handle this with a single entry that directly reduces the restricted fund balance and records the expense, but the conceptual flow — first release the restriction, then record the expenditure — is important for understanding how the Statement of Activities reflects grant spending.
How This Flows to Financial Statements
Statement of Financial Position (Balance Sheet):
- With-donor-restrictions net assets appear as a separate line from without-donor-restrictions net assets
- The balance in with-donor-restrictions represents unspent restricted funds, not yet eligible for general use
- A high restricted net asset balance is normal for grant-heavy organizations; it does not indicate cash availability for operations
Statement of Activities (Income Statement):
- Restricted contributions appear as revenue in the with-donor-restrictions column
- Net asset releases appear as a reduction in the with-donor-restrictions column and an addition in the without-donor-restrictions column (not as revenue — they are transfers between classes)
- Program expenses appear in the without-donor-restrictions column
Liquidity and Availability Note (Required by ASU 2016-14):
- Organizations must disclose how much of their financial assets are available for general expenditure within one year of the balance sheet date
- With-donor-restrictions assets are typically excluded from this availability calculation because they are not available for general use
Common Bookkeeping Mistakes
Recording restricted contributions as unrestricted revenue. The most consequential error. If a $100,000 grant is recorded as unrestricted contribution income, it shows up as available for any organizational purpose. The board may approve spending from it on general operations. When the grant is audited, the restricted use violations become apparent and must be resolved — sometimes requiring repayment to the grantor.
Releasing restrictions before conditions are met. Some organizations release the restriction as soon as they spend money, without verifying that the spending meets the restriction’s terms. A grant restricted to youth tutoring programs cannot be released by spending money on staff training that benefits the whole organization, even if some of those staff members work on the youth tutoring program.
Not tracking restrictions at the program level. Recording all restricted funds as a single with-donor-restrictions balance without sub-accounts by grant or purpose makes it impossible to know which restrictions have been met, which are partially met, and which are fully unspent. Each grant or restriction should have its own sub-account or project code.
Releasing permanently restricted endowment principal. Permanently restricted endowment principal (the corpus) is never released — only the investment income generated by the endowment may be spent, and only according to the endowment’s terms. Treating endowment principal as a spendable with-donor-restrictions fund is a significant accounting error.
Year-end errors. At fiscal year-end, review every restricted fund balance. Any unspent grant funds where the grant period has ended should prompt a determination: has the restriction been met and the close-out process completed? If not, the balance remains in with-donor-restrictions even across fiscal years until the grantor formally closes the award.
Practical Tracking Infrastructure
Clean restricted fund accounting requires a chart of accounts structure that supports it:
- Create a sub-account for each active grant within the with-donor-restrictions net asset class
- Code every expense charged to a grant to the corresponding grant project in your accounting system
- Run monthly reports showing the opening restricted balance, contributions received, expenditures charged, and closing restricted balance for each active grant
- Reconcile the accounting system grant balances against your grant management tracking records at least quarterly
Organizations that maintain this tracking continuously can produce a restricted fund reconciliation in minutes. Organizations that reconstruct it at year-end or at audit spend days on the same task.
Put Restricted Fund Accounting Basics for Nonprofits into practice
Pick a plan to see how GrantPipe turns restricted fund accounting basics for nonprofits into a repeatable donor, grant, and compliance workflow.
Frequently asked